Please refer to the online documentation with C API description and pay attention to the preliminary C++ API.

Questions, feedback and suggestions are welcome to the Telegram' group.

For NEWS take a look to the ChangeLog.

libmdbx

libmdbx is an extremely fast, compact, powerful, embedded, transactional key-value database, with permissive license. libmdbx has a specific set of properties and capabilities, focused on creating unique lightweight solutions.

1. Allows a swarm of multi-threaded processes to ACIDly read and update several key-value maps and multimaps in a locally-shared database.

2. Provides extraordinary performance, minimal overhead through Memory-Mapping and Olog(N) operations costs by virtue of B+ tree.

3. Requires no maintenance and no crash recovery since it doesn't use WAL, but that might be a caveat for write-intensive workloads with durability requirements.

4. Compact and friendly for fully embedding. Only ≈25KLOC of C11, ≈64K x86 binary code of core, no internal threads neither server process(es), but implements a simplified variant of the Berkeley DB and dbm API.

5. Enforces serializability for writers just by single mutex and affords wait-free for parallel readers without atomic/interlocked operations, while writing and reading transactions do not block each other.

6. Guarantee data integrity after crash unless this was explicitly neglected in favour of write performance.

7. Supports Linux, Windows, MacOS, Android, iOS, FreeBSD, DragonFly, Solaris, OpenSolaris, OpenIndiana, NetBSD, OpenBSD and other systems compliant with POSIX.1-2008.

Historically, libmdbx is a deeply revised and extended descendant of the amazing Lightning Memory-Mapped Database. libmdbx inherits all benefits from LMDB, but resolves some issues and adds a set of improvements.

The next version is under active non-public development from scratch and will be released as MithrilDB and libmithrildb for libraries & packages. Admittedly mythical Mithril is resembling silver but being stronger and lighter than steel. Therefore MithrilDB is a rightly relevant name.

MithrilDB will be radically different from libmdbx by the new database format and API based on C++17, as well as the Apache 2.0 License. The goal of this revolution is to provide a clearer and robust API, add more features and new valuable properties of the database.

The Future will (be) Positive. Всё будет хорошо.

---

Table of Contents

• Characteristics
  • Features
  • Limitations
  • Gotchas
  • Comparison with other databases
  • Improvements beyond LMDB
  • History & Acknowledgments
• Usage
  • Building
  • API description
  • Bindings
• Performance comparison
  • Integral performance
  • Read scalability
  • Sync-write mode
  • Lazy-write mode
  • Async-write mode
  • Cost comparison

Characteristics

Features

• Key-value data model, keys are always sorted.

• Fully ACID-compliant, through to MVCC and CoW.

• Multiple key-value sub-databases within a single datafile.

• Range lookups, including range query estimation.

• Efficient support for short fixed length keys, including native 32/64-bit integers.

• Ultra-efficient support for multimaps. Multi-values sorted, searchable and iterable. Keys stored without duplication.

• Data is memory-mapped and accessible directly/zero-copy. Traversal of database records is extremely-fast.

• Transactions for readers and writers, ones do not block others.

• Writes are strongly serialized. No transaction conflicts nor deadlocks.

• Readers are non-blocking, notwithstanding snapshot isolation.

• Nested write transactions.

• Reads scale linearly across CPUs.

• Continuous zero-overhead database compactification.

• Automatic on-the-fly database size adjustment.

• Customizable database page size.

• Olog(N) cost of lookup, insert, update, and delete operations by virtue of B+ tree characteristics.

• Online hot backup.

• Append operation for efficient bulk insertion of pre-sorted data.

• No WAL nor any transaction journal. No crash recovery needed. No maintenance is required.

• No internal cache and/or memory management, all done by basic OS services.

Limitations

• Page size: a power of 2, minimum 256 (mostly for testing), maximum 65536 bytes, default 4096 bytes.
• Key size: minimum 0, maximum ≈¼ pagesize (1348 bytes for default 4K pagesize, 21828 bytes for 64K pagesize).
• Value size: minimum 0, maximum 2146435072 (0x7FF00000) bytes for maps, ≈¼ pagesize for multimaps (1348 bytes for default 4K pagesize, 21828 bytes for 64K pagesize).
• Write transaction size: up to 1327217884 pages (4.944272 TiB for default 4K pagesize, 79.108351 TiB for 64K pagesize).
• Database size: up to 2147483648 pages (≈8.0 TiB for default 4K pagesize, ≈128.0 TiB for 64K pagesize).
• Maximum sub-databases: 32765.

Gotchas

1. There cannot be more than one writer at a time, i.e. no more than one write transaction at a time.

2. libmdbx is based on B+ tree, so access to database pages is mostly random. Thus SSDs provide a significant performance boost over spinning disks for large databases.

3. libmdbx uses shadow paging instead of WAL. Thus syncing data to disk might be a bottleneck for write intensive workload.

4. libmdbx uses copy-on-write for snapshot isolation during updates, but read transactions prevents recycling an old retired/freed pages, since it read ones. Thus altering of data during a parallel long-lived read operation will increase the process work set, may exhaust entire free database space, the database can grow quickly, and result in performance degradation. Try to avoid long running read transactions.

5. libmdbx is extraordinarily fast and provides minimal overhead for data access, so you should reconsider using brute force techniques and double check your code. On the one hand, in the case of libmdbx, a simple linear search may be more profitable than complex indexes. On the other hand, if you make something suboptimally, you can notice detrimentally only on sufficiently large data.

Comparison with other databases

For now please refer to chapter of "BoltDB comparison with other databases" which is also (mostly) applicable to libmdbx.

Improvements beyond LMDB

libmdbx is superior to legendary LMDB in terms of features and reliability, not inferior in performance. In comparison to LMDB, libmdbx make things "just work" perfectly and out-of-the-box, not silently and catastrophically break down. The list below is pruned down to the improvements most notable and obvious from the user's point of view.

Added Features

1. Keys could be more than 2 times longer than LMDB.

For DB with default page size libmdbx support keys up to 1300 bytes and up to 21780 bytes for 64K page size. LMDB allows key size up to 511 bytes and may silently loses data with large values.

2. Up to 30% faster than LMDB in CRUD benchmarks.

Benchmarks of the in-tmpfs scenarios, that tests the speed of the engine itself, showned that libmdbx 10-20% faster than LMDB, and up to 30% faster when libmdbx compiled with specific build options which downgrades several runtime checks to be match with LMDB behaviour.

These and other results could be easily reproduced with ioArena just by make bench-quartet command, including comparisons with RockDB and WiredTiger.

3. Automatic on-the-fly database size adjustment, both increment and reduction.

libmdbx manages the database size according to parameters specified by mdbx_env_set_geometry() function, ones include the growth step and the truncation threshold.

Unfortunately, on-the-fly database size adjustment doesn't work under Wine due to its internal limitations and unimplemented functions, i.e. the MDBX_UNABLE_EXTEND_MAPSIZE error will be returned.

4. Automatic continuous zero-overhead database compactification.

During each commit libmdbx merges suitable freeing pages into unallocated area at the end of file, and then truncates unused space when a lot enough of.

5. The same database format for 32- and 64-bit builds.

libmdbx database format depends only on the endianness but not on the bitness.

6. LIFO policy for Garbage Collection recycling. This can significantly increase write performance due write-back disk cache up to several times in a best case scenario.

LIFO means that for reuse will be taken the latest becomes unused pages. Therefore the loop of database pages circulation becomes as short as possible. In other words, the set of pages, that are (over)written in memory and on disk during a series of write transactions, will be as small as possible. Thus creates ideal conditions for the battery-backed or flash-backed disk cache efficiency.

7. Fast estimation of range query result volume, i.e. how many items can be found between a KEY1 and a KEY2. This is a prerequisite for build and/or optimize query execution plans.

libmdbx performs a rough estimate based on common B-tree pages of the paths from root to corresponding keys.

8. mdbx_chk utility for database integrity check. Since version 0.9.1, the utility supports checking the database using any of the three meta pages and the ability to switch to it.

9. Support for opening databases in the exclusive mode, including on a network share.

10. Zero-length for keys and values.

11. Ability to determine whether the particular data is on a dirty page or not, that allows to avoid copy-out before updates.

12. Extended information of whole-database, sub-databases, transactions, readers enumeration.

libmdbx provides a lot of information, including dirty and leftover pages for a write transaction, reading lag and holdover space for read transactions.

13. Extended update and delete operations.

libmdbx allows one at once with getting previous value and addressing the particular item from multi-value with the same key.

14. Useful runtime options for tuning engine to application's requirements and use cases specific.

15. Automated steady sync-to-disk upon several thresholds and/or timeout via cheap polling.

16. Sequence generation and three persistent 64-bit markers.

17. Handle-Slow-Readers callback to resolve a database full/overflow issues due to long-lived read transaction(s).

18. Ability to determine whether the cursor is pointed to a key-value pair, to the first, to the last, or not set to anything.

Other fixes and specifics

1. Fixed more than 10 significant errors, in particular: page leaks, wrong sub-database statistics, segfault in several conditions, nonoptimal page merge strategy, updating an existing record with a change in data size (including for multimap), etc.

2. All cursors can be reused and should be closed explicitly, regardless ones were opened within a write or read transaction.

3. Opening database handles are spared from race conditions and pre-opening is not needed.

4. Returning MDBX_EMULTIVAL error in case of ambiguous update or delete.

5. Guarantee of database integrity even in asynchronous unordered write-to-disk mode.

libmdbx propose additional trade-off by MDBX_SAFE_NOSYNC with append-like manner for updates, that avoids database corruption after a system crash contrary to LMDB. Nevertheless, the MDBX_UTTERLY_NOSYNC mode is available to match behaviour of the MDB_NOSYNC in LMDB.

6. On MacOS & iOS the fcntl(F_FULLFSYNC) syscall is used by default to synchronize data with the disk, as this is the only way to guarantee data durability in case of power failure. Unfortunately, in scenarios with high write intensity, the use of F_FULLFSYNC significantly degrades performance compared to LMDB, where the fsync() syscall is used. Therefore, libmdbx allows you to override this behavior by defining the MDBX_OSX_SPEED_INSTEADOF_DURABILITY=1 option while build the library.

7. On Windows the LockFileEx() syscall is used for locking, since it allows place the database on network drives, and provides protection against incompetent user actions (aka poka-yoke). Therefore libmdbx may be a little lag in performance tests from LMDB where the named mutexes are used.

History

Historically, libmdbx is a deeply revised and extended descendant of the Lightning Memory-Mapped Database. At first the development was carried out within the ReOpenLDAP project. About a year later libmdbx was separated into a standalone project, which was presented at Highload++ 2015 conference.

Since 2017 libmdbx is used in Fast Positive Tables, and development is funded by Positive Technologies.

Acknowledgments

Howard Chu hyc@openldap.org is the author of LMDB, from which originated the libmdbx in 2015.

Martin Hedenfalk martin@bzero.se is the author of btree.c code, which was used to begin development of LMDB.

---

Usage

Currently, libmdbx is only available in a source code form. Packages support for common Linux distributions is planned in the future, since release the version 1.0.

Source code embedding

libmdbx provides two official ways for integration in source code form:

1. Using the amalgamated source code.

The amalgamated source code includes all files required to build and use libmdbx, but not for testing libmdbx itself.

2. Adding the complete original source code as a git submodule.

This allows you to build as libmdbx and testing tool. On the other hand, this way requires you to pull git tags, and use C++11 compiler for test tool.

Please, avoid using any other techniques. Otherwise, at least don't ask for support and don't name such chimeras libmdbx.

The amalgamated source code could be created from the original clone of git repository on Linux by executing make dist. As a result, the desired set of files will be formed in the dist subdirectory.

Building

Both amalgamated and original source code provides build through the use CMake or GNU Make with bash. All build ways are completely traditional and have minimal prerequirements like build-essential, i.e. the non-obsolete C/C++ compiler and a SDK for the target platform. Obviously you need building tools itself, i.e. git, cmake or GNU make with bash.

So just using CMake or GNU Make in your habitual manner and feel free to fill an issue or make pull request in the case something will be unexpected or broken down.

DSO/DLL unloading and destructors of Thread-Local-Storage objects

When building libmdbx as a shared library or use static libmdbx as a part of another dynamic library, it is advisable to make sure that your system ensures the correctness of the call destructors of Thread-Local-Storage objects when unloading dynamic libraries.

If this is not the case, then unloading a dynamic-link library with libmdbx code inside, can result in either a resource leak or a crash due to calling destructors from an already unloaded DSO/DLL object. The problem can only manifest in a multithreaded application, which makes the unloading of shared dynamic libraries with libmdbx code inside, after using libmdbx. It is known that TLS-destructors are properly maintained in the following cases:

• On all modern versions of Windows (Windows 7 and later).

• On systems with the __cxa_thread_atexit_impl() function in the standard C library, including systems with GNU libc version 2.18 and later.

• On systems with libpthread/ntpl from GNU libc with bug fixes #21031 and #21032, or where there are no similar bugs in the pthreads implementation.

Linux and other platforms with GNU Make

To build the library it is enough to execute make all in the directory of source code, and make check to execute the basic tests.

If the make installed on the system is not GNU Make, there will be a lot of errors from make when trying to build. In this case, perhaps you should use gmake instead of make, or even gnu-make, etc.

FreeBSD and related platforms

As a rule, in such systems, the default is to use Berkeley Make. And GNU Make is called by the gmake command or may be missing. In addition, bash may be absent.

You need to install the required components: GNU Make, bash, C and C++ compilers compatible with GCC or CLANG. After that, to build the library, it is enough to execute gmake all (or make all) in the directory with source code, and gmake check (or make check) to run the basic tests.

Windows

For build libmdbx on Windows the original CMake and Microsoft Visual Studio 2019 are recommended. Otherwise do not forget to add ntdll.lib to linking.

Building by MinGW, MSYS or Cygwin is potentially possible. However, these scripts are not tested and will probably require you to modify the CMakeLists.txt or Makefile respectively.

It should be noted that in libmdbx was efforts to resolve runtime dependencies from CRT and other libraries Visual Studio. For this is enough to define the MDBX_AVOID_CRT during build.

An example of running a basic test script can be found in the CI-script for AppVeyor. To run the long stochastic test scenario, bash is required, and such testing is recommended with placing the test data on the RAM-disk.

Windows Subsystem for Linux

libmdbx could be used in WSL2 but NOT in WSL1 environment. This is a consequence of the fundamental shortcomings of WSL1 and cannot be fixed. To avoid data loss, libmdbx returns the ENOLCK (37, "No record locks available") error when opening the database in a WSL1 environment.

MacOS

Current native build tools for MacOS include GNU Make, CLANG and an outdated version of bash. Therefore, to build the library, it is enough to run make all in the directory with source code, and run make check to execute the base tests. If something goes wrong, it is recommended to install Homebrew and try again.

To run the long stochastic test scenario, you will need to install the current (not outdated) version of bash. To do this, we recommend that you install Homebrew and then execute brew install bash.

Android

We recommend using CMake to build libmdbx for Android. Please refer to the official guide.

iOS

To build libmdbx for iOS, we recommend using CMake with the "toolchain file" from the ios-cmake project.

API description

Please refer to the online libmdbx API reference and/or see the mdbx.h header.

Bindings

Runtime	Repo	Author
Ruby	ruby-mdbx	Mahlon E. Smith
Go	mdbx-go	Alex Sharov
Nim	NimDBX	Jens Alfke
Rust	heed, mdbx-rs	Clément Renault
Java	mdbxjni	Castor Technologies
.NET	mdbx.NET	Jerry Wang

---

Performance comparison

All benchmarks were done in 2015 by IOArena and multiple scripts runs on Lenovo Carbon-2 laptop, i7-4600U 2.1 GHz (2 physical cores, 4 HyperThreading cores), 8 Gb RAM, SSD SAMSUNG MZNTD512HAGL-000L1 (DXT23L0Q) 512 Gb.

Integral performance

Here showed sum of performance metrics in 3 benchmarks:

• Read/Search on the machine with 4 logical CPUs in HyperThreading mode (i.e. actually 2 physical CPU cores);

• Transactions with CRUD operations in sync-write mode (fdatasync is called after each transaction);

• Transactions with CRUD operations in lazy-write mode (moment to sync data to persistent storage is decided by OS).

Reasons why asynchronous mode isn't benchmarked here:

1. It doesn't make sense as it has to be done with DB engines, oriented for keeping data in memory e.g. Tarantool, Redis), etc.

2. Performance gap is too high to compare in any meaningful way.

---

Read Scalability

Summary performance with concurrent read/search queries in 1-2-4-8 threads on the machine with 4 logical CPUs in HyperThreading mode (i.e. actually 2 physical CPU cores).

---

Sync-write mode

• Linear scale on left and dark rectangles mean arithmetic mean transactions per second;

• Logarithmic scale on right is in seconds and yellow intervals mean execution time of transactions. Each interval shows minimal and maximum execution time, cross marks standard deviation.

10,000 transactions in sync-write mode. In case of a crash all data is consistent and conforms to the last successful transaction. The fdatasync syscall is used after each write transaction in this mode.

In the benchmark each transaction contains combined CRUD operations (2 inserts, 1 read, 1 update, 1 delete). Benchmark starts on an empty database and after full run the database contains 10,000 small key-value records.

---

Lazy-write mode

• Linear scale on left and dark rectangles mean arithmetic mean of thousands transactions per second;

• Logarithmic scale on right in seconds and yellow intervals mean execution time of transactions. Each interval shows minimal and maximum execution time, cross marks standard deviation.

100,000 transactions in lazy-write mode. In case of a crash all data is consistent and conforms to the one of last successful transactions, but transactions after it will be lost. Other DB engines use WAL or transaction journal for that, which in turn depends on order of operations in the journaled filesystem. libmdbx doesn't use WAL and hands I/O operations to filesystem and OS kernel (mmap).

In the benchmark each transaction contains combined CRUD operations (2 inserts, 1 read, 1 update, 1 delete). Benchmark starts on an empty database and after full run the database contains 100,000 small key-value records.

---

Async-write mode

• Linear scale on left and dark rectangles mean arithmetic mean of thousands transactions per second;

• Logarithmic scale on right in seconds and yellow intervals mean execution time of transactions. Each interval shows minimal and maximum execution time, cross marks standard deviation.

1,000,000 transactions in async-write mode. In case of a crash all data is consistent and conforms to the one of last successful transactions, but lost transaction count is much higher than in lazy-write mode. All DB engines in this mode do as little writes as possible on persistent storage. libmdbx uses msync(MS_ASYNC) in this mode.

In the benchmark each transaction contains combined CRUD operations (2 inserts, 1 read, 1 update, 1 delete). Benchmark starts on an empty database and after full run the database contains 10,000 small key-value records.

---

Cost comparison

Summary of used resources during lazy-write mode benchmarks:

• Read and write IOPs;

• Sum of user CPU time and sys CPU time;

• Used space on persistent storage after the test and closed DB, but not waiting for the end of all internal housekeeping operations (LSM compactification, etc).

ForestDB is excluded because benchmark showed it's resource consumption for each resource (CPU, IOPs) much higher than other engines which prevents to meaningfully compare it with them.

All benchmark data is gathered by getrusage() syscall and by scanning the data directory.

---

This is a mirror of the origin repository that was moved to abf.io because of discriminatory restrictions for Russian Crimea.