ISAR/libmdbx
3
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/isar/libmdbx.git synced 2025-08-19 19:39:26 +08:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

mdbx: update github repo address.

Browse Source 
Change-Id: Ifa8bf0e09b297ba6f495dd8e04e5c67f6626d9cb
This commit is contained in:
Leonid Yuriev
2020-02-18 02:22:47 +03:00
parent dbf9873e63
commit bd3f234bce
9 changed files with 19 additions and 19 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

20
README.md
View File

@@ -49,8 +49,8 @@ _MithrilDB_ is rightly relevant name.
> revolution is to provide a clearer and robust API, add more features and
> new valuable properties of database.
[![Build Status](https://travis-ci.org/leo-yuriev/libmdbx.svg?branch=master)](https://travis-ci.org/leo-yuriev/libmdbx)
[![Build status](https://ci.appveyor.com/api/projects/status/ue94mlopn50dqiqg/branch/master?svg=true)](https://ci.appveyor.com/project/leo-yuriev/libmdbx/branch/master)
[![Build Status](https://travis-ci.org/erthink/libmdbx.svg?branch=master)](https://travis-ci.org/erthink/libmdbx)
[![Build status](https://ci.appveyor.com/api/projects/status/ue94mlopn50dqiqg/branch/master?svg=true)](https://ci.appveyor.com/project/erthink/libmdbx/branch/master)
[![Coverity Scan Status](https://scan.coverity.com/projects/12915/badge.svg)](https://scan.coverity.com/projects/reopen-libmdbx)
*The Future will (be) [Positive](https://www.ptsecurity.com). Всё будет хорошо.*
@@ -268,12 +268,12 @@ named mutexes are used.
### History
At first the development was carried out within the
[ReOpenLDAP](https://github.com/leo-yuriev/ReOpenLDAP) project. About a
[ReOpenLDAP](https://github.com/erthink/ReOpenLDAP) project. About a
year later _libmdbx_ was separated into standalone project, which was
[presented at Highload++ 2015
conference](http://www.highload.ru/2015/abstracts/1831.html).
Since 2017 _libmdbx_ is used in [Fast Positive Tables](https://github.com/leo-yuriev/libfpta),
Since 2017 _libmdbx_ is used in [Fast Positive Tables](https://github.com/erthink/libfpta),
and development is funded by [Positive Technologies](https://www.ptsecurity.com).
### Acknowledgments
@@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ Here showed sum of performance metrics in 3 benchmarks:
2. Performance gap is too high to compare in any meaningful way.
![Comparison #1: Integral Performance](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wiki/leo-yuriev/libmdbx/img/perf-slide-1.png)
![Comparison #1: Integral Performance](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wiki/erthink/libmdbx/img/perf-slide-1.png)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -454,7 +454,7 @@ Here showed sum of performance metrics in 3 benchmarks:
Summary performance with concurrent read/search queries in 1-2-4-8
threads on 4 CPU cores machine.
![Comparison #2: Read Scalability](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wiki/leo-yuriev/libmdbx/img/perf-slide-2.png)
![Comparison #2: Read Scalability](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wiki/erthink/libmdbx/img/perf-slide-2.png)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -476,7 +476,7 @@ In the benchmark each transaction contains combined CRUD operations (2
inserts, 1 read, 1 update, 1 delete). Benchmark starts on empty database
and after full run the database contains 10,000 small key-value records.
![Comparison #3: Sync-write mode](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wiki/leo-yuriev/libmdbx/img/perf-slide-3.png)
![Comparison #3: Sync-write mode](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wiki/erthink/libmdbx/img/perf-slide-3.png)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -503,7 +503,7 @@ and after full run the database contains 100,000 small key-value
records.
![Comparison #4: Lazy-write mode](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wiki/leo-yuriev/libmdbx/img/perf-slide-4.png)
![Comparison #4: Lazy-write mode](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wiki/erthink/libmdbx/img/perf-slide-4.png)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -527,7 +527,7 @@ In the benchmark each transaction contains combined CRUD operations (2
inserts, 1 read, 1 update, 1 delete). Benchmark starts on empty database
and after full run the database contains 10,000 small key-value records.
![Comparison #5: Async-write mode](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wiki/leo-yuriev/libmdbx/img/perf-slide-5.png)
![Comparison #5: Async-write mode](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wiki/erthink/libmdbx/img/perf-slide-5.png)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -551,7 +551,7 @@ All benchmark data is gathered by
[getrusage()](http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/getrusage.2.html)
syscall and by scanning data directory.
![Comparison #6: Cost comparison](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wiki/leo-yuriev/libmdbx/img/perf-slide-6.png)
![Comparison #6: Cost comparison](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wiki/erthink/libmdbx/img/perf-slide-6.png)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------