From 80de77b1eec98ec92ccaef2ed6d3cb059b751f90 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?=D0=9B=D0=B5=D0=BE=D0=BD=D0=B8=D0=B4=20=D0=AE=D1=80=D1=8C?= =?UTF-8?q?=D0=B5=D0=B2=20=28Leonid=20Yuriev=29?= Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2025 16:52:53 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?mdbx-doc:=20=D0=BE=D0=BF=D0=B5=D1=87=D0=B0?= =?UTF-8?q?=D1=82=D0=BA=D0=B8=20=D0=B2=20README=20(backport).?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --- README.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index f37d56f9..1bad0676 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ which is also (mostly) applicable to _libmdbx_ with minor clarification: - a database could shared by multiple processes, i.e. no multi-process issues; - no issues with moving a cursor(s) after the deletion; - _libmdbx_ provides zero-overhead database compactification, so a database file could be shrinked/truncated in particular cases; - - excluding dist I/O time _libmdbx_ could be -3 times faster than BoltDB and up to 10-100K times faster than both BoltDB and LMDB in particular extreme cases; + - excluding disk I/O time _libmdbx_ could be ≈3 times faster than BoltDB and up to 10-100K times faster than both BoltDB and LMDB in particular extreme cases; - _libmdbx_ provides more features compared to BoltDB and/or LMDB.